Page 1 of 1

Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 9:20 am
by FishingFool
:-k #-o

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 12:39 pm
by Amx
Yes, but 'they' closed fishing until April 8th.

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Thu Mar 26, 2020 9:59 pm
by FishingFool
Amx wrote:
Thu Mar 26, 2020 12:39 pm
Yes, but 'they' closed fishing until April 8th.
Those SOB.

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2020 10:40 pm
by redroostertail
It’s essential to my well being
And the best way I know how to self quarantine
Ridiculous

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Sat Mar 28, 2020 5:41 am
by hewesfisher

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:37 am
by G-Man
What kills me is that I'm most socially distant when on my boat, by myself out the water.

Not to worry though, I'm certain the commercial and tribal fishermen will be more that willing to harvest our share while we are directed to stay at home, especially on the Columbia River system.

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Mon Apr 06, 2020 10:04 pm
by ruthven78
they extended the closure to May 4th

Re: Can fishing be considered "esstential"?

Posted: Tue Apr 07, 2020 8:09 pm
by Kastmaster 777
G-Man wrote:
Sun Mar 29, 2020 8:37 am
What kills me is that I'm most socially distant when on my boat, by myself out the water.

Not to worry though, I'm certain the commercial and tribal fishermen will be more that willing to harvest our share while we are directed to stay at home, especially on the Columbia River system.
Im sure they are going to take advantage of this. More salmon for them